Tag Archives: Culloden

Jamie’s Outlander Binge: Season 2, Ep 13

Posted on by

Part 8: Love Me Do

Wherein the years fly by, and everybody swaps tartan for turtle-necks

I’ve admitted in previous entries that I’m woefully ignorant of the intricacies of my own country’s history, and have tended to glean most of my impressions of life in the 18th century highlands from fictional sources, Braveheart and Rob Roy among them. Although Outlander is yet another fictional source to add to my pile of well-intentioned misinformation, atleast the show has recently half-inspired me, half-shamed me into picking up a few history books.

I’m ready to share with you already, class. The following passage, which appears early in John Prebble’s 1963 book ‘The Highland Clearances’, seemed to jump up from the page and lodge itself into my brain: “Beyond the mountains the Highlander was despised and hated. Mi-run mor nan Gall, he called it, the Lowlander’s great hatred. And this hatred was to persist until Walter Scott and his imitators took the Highlander out of his environment, disinfected him, dressed him in romance, and made him respectable enough to be a gun-bearer for an English sportsman, a servant to a Queen, or a bayonet-carrier for imperialism.”

I wonder if Outlander, despite its unflinching portrayal of blood, death and violence, has been guilty of this ‘disinfection’ of Highland culture through the romantic figure of Jamie. It’s certainly guilty of the disinfection of the Highland sex life. As I’m on record as saying, many times over, I rather imagine that sex in those days was more of a leaky, itchy, dirty, pus-filled sort of an affair, as opposed to a slow, sexy and cinematic experience: warts-and-all, both literally and figuratively.

Putting my sex obsession aside for a moment, I think it’s fair to say that late 18th century Scotland is unknowable. Not unimaginable, but unknowable. We can draw on a range of physical, historical and literary evidence to construct a workable facsimile of the era in our minds, or on our screens, but we’ll never know for certain if the world we’ve created looks and feels right. We’ll never know exactly what it smelled like, what it sounded like, what it tasted like. If the future is an undiscovered country, then the past is an undiscoverable one.

We don’t, however, have to travel too far back in time to reach the limits of our knowledge. It struck me while watching ‘A Dragonfly in Amber’ that the 1960s are just as unknowable to me as those heather-strewn highlands of the Jacobean era, despite the wealth of audio-visual evidence, and the functioning memories and recollections of the hundreds of millions of still-breathing people who lived through that decade in all its swinging glory. Although the 1960s finished only ten short years before my triumphant emergence into this world, they might as well have been the 1860s for all the connection I feel to them.

I suppose the recent past can seem so otherworldly in large part due to how quickly the world moves these days. Whereas the gaps between us used to be measured in multiples of generations, the size, scale and frequency of the leaps we’re now making in science, technology, industry, law, ethics, and art can render a person socially and technologically obsolete within a handful of years. There isn’t a generation gap: there’s a generation minefield, and it’s expanding every day.

TV and pop culture has helped both to enshrine and demarcate the different decades of the late 20th century. The 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s all seem unique and wholly distinct from one other, even though the blends, blurs and overlaps between them would’ve made them difficult to tell apart if not for our habit of partitioning the stories of our lives into acts, blocks and scenes.

Of course, each ‘distinct’ era means different things to different people depending upon which stage of their lives they’re experiencing as they pass through them. My great-grandmother, for instance, was unlikely to have spent the 1960s lounging around a squat, smoking joints and listening to the Monkees. Likewise, I’m reasonably sure that my grandmother didn’t shave her head on the morning of January the 1st 1980 and then spend the rest of the 80s togged up in denim, and throwing bricks at police cars while chanting ‘Death to Thatcher’s fascists!’

AMC’s stunning, 60s-set series Mad Men first brought the duality of the decades home to me. When Don Draper and his debauched colleagues in ad-land come into contact with 60s counter-culture, they’re amused, bemused and repulsed by it in equal measure. It runs past them, and over them, but not to them, or from them. Their world isn’t one of swinging hips, pop music and loose-fitting fashions, but of double-breasted suits, stiff upper lips, jaunty-angled hats and incredibly heavy-drinking at all times of the day and night. Don Draper may have been living through the 1960s when we met him, but he came of age in the 1940s, and that era and its attitudes left an indelible mark on his head, heart, and… many other organs, too. In many ways, the world that washes over us in our adolescence tends to preserve the larger part of us in, well… amber.

What, then, must it feel like for Claire, who began her journey at the end of World War 2, jumped to the beginning of the second Jacobite uprising, and now finds herself a middle-aged woman living in the age of beatniks, Beatles and Bob Dylan? Who is Claire now? And who are Claire and Jamie without each other?

‘Dragonfly in Amber’ sees Claire return to Scotland to attend the Reverend Wakefield’s funeral. Along for the ride is her now-adult daughter Brianna, who’s as snappy, sarcastic, and sassy as she is just occasionally very grating. The Reverend’s adopted son, Roger, serves as their host, splitting his time between eulogising, drinking whisky and rocking that faux folk-singer look. I’m pretty sure Roger is going to try to, if you’ll forgive the crudity, well… roger… Brianna. Frank is with them all in spirit, if not in body, on account of him being so hip that he’s actually dead.

He’s not the only one…

Back in 1746 – if you’ll permit me to nip through the stones for a second – it’s time to bid a rather gruesome farewell to Dougal.

I knew Dougal was going to die. Not only because narratively, and perhaps even historically, there was no other way, but because somebody let the cat out of the bag without meaning to. Or, I suppose you could say, they put the cat into the bag and killed it right there in front of me. It can be dangerous to share binge-watch re-caps in Outlander fan forums on Facebook when you’re seasons behind the herd, and happen to share a first name with one of the show’s main characters. One blissfully unaware lady accidentally tagged me in a post to tell me that Jamie killed Dougal, without meaning to tell me, or even realising that she had. Don’t cry for me, ladies and gentlemen. I knew the risks going in. Besides, the particulars of Dougal’s death were thankfully still surprising.

Dougal’s death felt a little sudden and perfunctory, but I guess the character had already made his big exit – certainly his emotional one – in the previous episode. The tears he cried over his brother’s body – and those he coaxed from my eyes – were plenty enough for both brothers. When it came time for Dougal to actually die, by a Clamie tag-team take-down no less, there was nothing left to feel.

Dougal’s fierce patriotism and nationalist zeal had been so firmly established that when he overheard Claire and Jamie discussing the best way to bump off Bonnie Prince Charlie, there was a grim inevitability to what came next. Culloden would’ve killed him anyway, but death decided to knock a day early for Dougal. I guess the bureaucrats in the afterlife had occupancy issues to consider for the following day, so tried to stagger admission a little on the Scottish side.

Ah, Claire and Jamie. You know what they say about the couple that kills together, don’t you? That they, uh… suffer… from… some description of shared post-traumatic stress disorder together…em, I’d assume. That’s not very catchy is it? I’ll try again: the couple who kills together, em, chills together?Would a murder bring you closer as a couple? I suppose it would. In its own perverse and shocking way, it’s rather an intimate act.

Even still… they probably shouldn’t make a habit of it.

Anyway, time to go back to the future.

The segments set in the 60s begin with Claire and Brianna being haunted by Jamie’s ghost, and end with the tantalising, life-altering revelation that Jamie might not be as dead as Claire had believed. Even though, you know, he’s still dead, because it’s 1968, and Scottish people don’t tend to live past 50, never mind 200. But you know what I mean.

Claire’s goodbye to Jamie, as she touched ‘his’ grave-marker on the battlefield at Culloden, wasn’t sad or emotionally affecting at all, and I DIDN’T CRY, SO FUCK OFF. (coughs) OK? I did NOT cry…

STOP GOING ON ABOUT IT, CAUSE IT DIDN’T HAPPEN.

OK?!

It’s hard for me to judge how well the Outlander team has captured the essence of 1960s Scotland, but it seems to me that you can’t go far wrong with putting everyone in turtle-neck sweaters.

Whatever else the show may have got right, I found myself deeply sceptical that an Inverness college in 1968 would have been a place of fervour, passion, bustle and enthusiasm. I cringed a little as Gillian Edgars – aka Geillis the Witchy Wifey – led a chant of ‘We are Scotland’ inside the college. It wasn’t the sentiment that registered as incongruous – after all, I’m a card-carrying member of the SNP, and passionately pro-independence to boot – but the articulation. I suspect that the American writers responsible for adapting this episode for TV, Toni Graphia and Matthew B Roberts, let a little bit of spiritual Americana bleed into the mix.

Just for future reference: modern and semi-modern Scottish people don’t tend to gather excitedly to pronounce unabashedly life-affirming sentiments to all who will listen; unless they’re so drunk that they can hardly hold their fish supper aloft, or locked in the fury or fervour of a football match’s assault-ridden aftermath.

In the corridors of colleges and polytechnics the country over – even now – Scotland’s youth are far more likely to be found huddled in hostile sub-groups, nary a second of eye-contact shared between them, kicking, shuffling and grumbling their way down the blank-walled corridors, with blank minds to match. I’m willing to suspend my disbelief long enough to believe in shards of stone that can send people hurtling through time, but a Scottish college brimming over with happy, healthy and reasonably attractive people? Come on, Outlander. There are limits to my credulity.

And who’s got these students whipped into a frenzy with all their talk of patriotic duty? Hey, everyone, Geillis is back! Well, she’s not back, if ye ken whit a mean, for she hasnae left yet. Och, dinna fash, it’s the time travel, ye ken. Spins yer heid, so it dis.

I guess it doesn’t matter too much to non-Scottish ears, but I always found something a little off-kilter with Geillis’ accent. It was almost-nearly-sort-of-okay, but the enunciation was too over-stated, and it had a weird twang to it. It was obvious to me that the actress wasn’t a native Scot, but I’ll tell you something, I respected her attempt all the more once I discovered that she was Dutch. Everybody thinks they can do a Scottish accent (in reality, there are a multitude of languages, accents and dialects in even this small country), but few can do it well. Lotte Verbeek, when I say that your attempt was almost-nearly-sort-of-okay, believe me, that’s a supreme compliment.

Geillis functions to bring us full circle to the first season of the show, and to make fresh connections going forward. The burning tableau Geillis makes of her alcoholic husband in the centre of the stones, and her subsequent disappearance into the winds of time, make a believer out of Brianna, who up until that point had been understandably sceptical of her mother’s story of having been impregnated by an 18th century highlander after falling through a magical portal into the past.

Now that Brianna knows the truth, and Claire knows that Jamie survived Culloden, how will she get back to him? And how can she be sure she’ll be able to jump back into his time-line at the correct point – even supposing that he lasted much past Culloden? More importantly, how can she leave her daughter behind to go gallivanting through time once again?

Only time will tell.

Here’s to season three.

A few final, disjointed thoughts

  • There’s a lot of accent horseplay and sleight-of-hand in Outlander. In this episode, Brianna, a character born and raised in America, attempts a Scottish accent, which moves Roger to pronounce: ‘That is the worst accent I have ever heard.’ Even funnier, the actress who plays Brianna, Sophie Skelton, is actually English. So she’s an English woman pretending to be an American pretending to be Scottish. Hats off to you, Sophie. That’s a tricky hat-trick.
  • I’ve also just recently learned that Duncan Lacroix is ENGLISH! Jesus, that threw me. Again, there was always something just a teeny, tiny bit unusual about Murtagh’s accent, but Lacroix always inhabits Murtagh so completely, that I didn’t even stop for a second to consider the actor’s heritage.
  • There are a lot of lovely little touches in this episode. Like when Brianna asks her mother – ‘Do you miss him?’, meaning Frank, the man she’d always believed to be her father. The look of hesitation on Claire’s face, and the torturous duality of her answer, all unbeknownst to Brianna, works really well.
  • Claire to Roger, as Geillis’ husband smoulders nearby. “Roger – go get help.” Em, I think we’re a little past that, Claire. You’re not the world’s most perceptive doctor, are you?
  • There’s a neat, if a little on-the-nose, symmetry at play here: Geillis burned her husband, and got burned in return. Hell begets hell. And Dougal and Geillis beget Roger, by the looks of it, give or take a few begets.

I’ll be back with season three of my binge-watch in 2019. Thanks for coming on this journey with me, and rediscovering your favourite show through fresh eyes. It’s been a blast, and as much as I may sometimes jest, I’m really enjoying it so far.

READ THE REST – Click below

Why I want to binge-watch Outlander

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 1 – 4

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 5 – 8

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 9 – 12

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 13 – 16

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 2, Eps 1 – 4

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 2, Eps 5 – 7

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 2, Eps 8 – 10

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 2, Eps 11 – 12

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 3, Eps 1 -3

30 Things You Didn’t Know About Scotland

Jamie’s Outlander Binge: Season 2, Eps 11 – 12

Posted on by

Part 7: Death Becomes Them

Wherein we say, ‘Adios, Dukey’, and consider the twin titans of love and death

I still encounter people, mostly men, who sniffily dismiss Outlander as a sort-of slightly more risque Downton Abbey: all frilly collars, bloodless duels, breathless embraces, passionate kisses, romantic outpourings and impenetrable ye olde speak. I can’t blame them. I counted myself among their number until very recently. Perhaps they’ll take the plunge, as I did, and find to their surprise and delight that Outlander is a fast-paced, funny, well-written, visceral and occasionally very, very gory show; a rollicking roller-coaster of pure entertainment that’s got more in common with Vikings than it does Howard’s End.

Help is at hand. Well… head. Every time I find myself slipping back into old habits and buying into the lie that Outlander is first-and-foremost a piece of soppy romantic fiction, I’m going to remember Murtagh hacking off the Duke of Sandringham’s head and kicking it across the kitchen floor like some horrifying football with eyes. It doesn’t get much less bosoms and bodices than that.

When the camera panned to Murtagh’s bloodied face I was a little disappointed not to hear him issue a classic action-movie quip, something along the lines of: “I guess he finally stuck his neck oot for someone,” or “This isnae the time tae be losin’ yer heid, duke.” Some things are better left unsaid, I suppose, and I’m sure I would’ve been disappointed had Outlander suddenly and inexplicably turned into an Arnold Schwarzenegger movie. I did thoroughly enjoy Mary Hawkins’ parting line, though, which must surely qualify as one the greatest understatements of the century (indeed, of two centuries), not to mention one of the most blindingly obvious: “I think we’d better go.”

Yes, Mary. I think you might just better had. Mind how you go. Watch you don’t trip over all those bears shitting in the woods, and Catholic popes.

And, so, another baddie bites the dust. Farewell, then, Duke of S, you slippery, slithering, sociopathic little socialite. I’ll miss you – although in the hours leading up to your death your villainy lost a little of the nuance that had made me love it, and you, so much. I preferred you with your mask half-on, when your charm was the loudest instrument in that cross between an orchestra and an arsenal you always kept holstered in that sallow old soul of yours.

The Duke and Randall were certainly well-matched companions as they marched together along the merry road to complete-and-total bastardom, both wearing their narcissism on their sleeves, but with the Duke’s cold anger resting a little deeper beneath the surface than Black Jack’s. There was something cartoonish about the Duke’s savageness when he finally unleashed it, but I suppose as he entered his final gambit he had little need of charm or pretence, preferring instead to cast them aside and growl out the details of his fiendish scheme like some low-tier Scooby Doo villain. “And I would’ve gotten away with it, too, if it wasn’t for that pesky, propulsive, all-consuming love between Jamie and Claire!” You silly man. Never bet against Jamie and Claire’s love. NEVER.

While the show doesn’t always have the outward appearance or traditional structure of romantic fiction, that molten kernel of Anglo-Scottish passion and devotion that sits at its core is hard as a thousand diamonds, and turns the very world of Outlander around it. Claire and Jamie are like a reverse Romeo and Juliet, whose tragedy is radiated on to the people around them, causing them to die instead.

Ultimately, the very thing that made the Duke’s plan ‘work’ – Jamie’s love for Claire – was also the very thing that guaranteed its failure. But we’ll let the Duke off the hook for that, because the poor love had no idea he was a character in a TV show.

While Sandringham’s mask was off (before his very head was off, too) he revealed to Claire his fiendish plot to hand over Jamie and her, his traitorous wife, to the King, so as to remove all suspicion from the Royal Court that he was, or ever had been, a Jacobite sympathiser. Which of course he was/had been, whenever it seemed to suit him. He seemed to be perpetually hedging his bets like some covetous, duplicitous cross between a Ferengi and a Vorta (dropping in some hard-core Deep Space Nine references, y’all). There were innumerable signals throughout the series that old Dukey Boy wasn’t exactly the world’s most committed Jacobite, but even if you didn’t know his history of self-serving treachery, his line to Claire “Gaelic – do you speak that barbarous tongue?” gives the game away somewhat. Claire has always had his number in any case.

Duke: “You know in my heart I’ve always been a Jacobite.”

Claire: “I’m reasonably sure you don’t have a heart.”

Hey, guys! Black Jack Randall’s back in town, too! But more on him later… The Duke also revealed that it was he who had hired the rape gang back in Paris, of which Claire had been the intended target, with poor Mary becoming the worst kind of collateral damage. It was for this heinous crime in particular that Mary Hawkins and Murtagh had vowed bloody revenge on the Duke (though they hadn’t known he was the guilty party when they’d made their vow), and it was revenge – foul and bloody – that they got. In the kitchens of Callendar House, no less. Callendar Park and House is situated across the road from my old high school. And my two kids were running around like possessed Tasmanian devils in that very kitchen during an open day last year. As much as I’d like to see their flash of recognition, I think I’ll wait until they’re at least… five before showing them that scene. I don’t want them to be scarred.

It was a nice touch to see the Duke desperately trying to re-fasten his mask of civility when Jamie burst into the kitchen; even nicer to see the vain old sod clamouring to put his wig back on. Even when facing certain death, appearances were still the most important thing to the Duke.

While appearances are certainly important, they’re never that important, and they can be incredibly deceptive. Take Dougal, for instance. He’s a son of a bitch, to be sure, but yet he keeps committing genuinely selfless acts that confound my impression of him: like testing how far the English soldiers’ bullets can reach across a battlefield by proffering his bald head to the enemy, or daringly dashing to Rupert’s rescue after he’s been shot by a band of Redcoats.

Let’s talk Rupert. I’d like to submit old Rupes into the running for the ‘Unluckiest Man in the Universe’ award. First, he almost dies in battle; then his best (perhaps only) friend in the world dies violently in a froth of his own blood having risked his life to save him; then he gets his eye shot out; then he gets captured … I’m sensing a pattern emerging. What next? A giant piano crashing down on his head? An anvil? A massive stick of ACME dynamite? Rupert’s recent hardships bring to mind Chef’s ludicrously drawn-out death sequence in South Park. Worse still, even if poor Rupert recovers, the only future open to him is an unspeakably violent death on the battlefield at Culloden, which he’ll meet while wearing an eye-patch that I hope earns him the nickname ‘Nick McFury’. Maybe in another life Rupert will come back as a lucky white heather salesman.

Death is everywhere in these two episodes. It’s so ever-present it’s almost a character. Claire, especially, is submerged in it, giving palliative care to her greatest enemy’s kin, and euthanising her old boss cum gaoler. Everyone has come to Culloden to die, it seems: the soldiers; Colum; Alex Randall; Black Jack Randall (although he doesn’t yet know it). It’s the bloody Switzerland of the north.

Death has the power to transform, to soften, to redeem, and that’s as true in Outlander as it is in life. Death is both transformative in a literal sense and transformative in a retrospective, metaphorical sense. Literally, because… well. You’re dead. It doesn’t really get much more transformative than that; even a caterpillar would have to agree. And retrospectively, because at the very moment when someone’s light is extinguished we tend to remember the light of their life shining brighter than perhaps it ever really did. We remember the departed as being better and bolder; cooler and kinder. Our love and mercy are amplified.

Much of our wistfulness springs from our own feelings about death: we fear it almost as much as we revere it, so we tend to become awestruck in its presence. We sit and we ponder, and we think to ourselves, ‘One human being fewer in the great infinite canvas of the cosmos, and yet what an incalculable loss to the universe,’ and perhaps – depending upon who we’ve lost – we cry, our grief temporarily blinding us to the world.

This whole, sad process can sometimes make it easy to forget that the person we mourn was – if you’ll allow me to fall back on reasonably esoteric philosophical language for a moment – an absolute fucking dickhead.

Death’s looming spectre is the only thing that makes half of the characters in this show palatable. Not only did I almost shed a tear for the immensely irritating Angus during my last binge-watch, but this time I found myself bubbling up as crotchety old Colum breathed his last.

I never really liked Colum – the character, not the actor – and I’m positive I wasn’t supposed to, but the combination of Dougal’s goodbye, and the revelation of just how pragmatic, insightful, forward-thinking and measured a leader Colum could be (and undoubtedly was, though I was perhaps too blinded by distaste to see it) made me realise that I’d miss him. Although I won’t miss his dress-style. In many ways he deserved his death simply for turning up wearing that brown fur coat, looking more like a horse-racing pundit, or a 1st-division football manager from the 1970s, than a laird.

To be fair, Graham McTavish absolutely knocks it out of the park during Colum’s death scene, no doubt reveling in the opportunity to show some of the nuance behind the gruff and growling Dougal. It’s all there in the complex carousel of emotions swirling and spinning on McTavish’s face: the haughtiness, the hatred, the love, the guilt, the spite, the remorse. Despite all that’s passed between them, love prevails. That’s what stays with Dougal, and that’s what stays with us. Christ, it was moving. When Dougal hugged Colum and blubbed, ‘All this cause you couldnae stay on a bloody horse,’ I absolutely lost it. I’m not allowed to say I cried like a big girl anymore in 2018, so I suppose I should say that I cried like a big man, and that’s okay, because men can cry too. BUT ONLY AT TV AND FOOTBALL.

Black Jack was in town, too, so it was time for us to dust off the DSM and have another game of ‘Psycho Bingo’. Except, initially at least, this was a different Black Jack. A more rounded, human version; one who seemed to show tenderness and compassion. He was in town to tend to his brother, Alex Randall, who was succumbing to the illness that had plagued him since Paris. Turns out old Black Jack had also been paying the bills for both his brother and his newly pregnant wife, Mary Hawkins. What a… nice… thing to do. It is nice, isn’t it? Is this still earth? Am I still me? Is up still ‘up’? Why is Captain Randall being nice?!

When Black Jack encounters Claire at his brother’s bedside he begs – begs?! – her to nurse him back to health, or out of suffering, but she refuses unless Black Jack agrees to reveal the location of the British troops.

“You would barter over an innocent man’s suffering?” he asks her.

This was delicious: the indignant nature of the sociopath, railing against injustice with zero sense of perspective or irony. It brought to mind Tony Soprano scolding his psychiatrist for ‘acting unethically’, or Ted Bundy complaining that it was inhumane not to have access to his prison library.

But Tony Soprano and Ted Bundy both, in their own way, helped people, too. Tony was capable of great generosity and gregariousness, and Ted Bundy volunteered at a crisis hot-line, often talking people out of self-harm and suicide. In both fiction and real-life there are plenty of examples of sociopaths doing good deeds, even if they could never be described as good people.

Black Jack ends up doing something else ‘nice’ for his brother: agreeing to marry Mary Hawkins so that she and her baby will have his protection. I must admit, Mary’s pregnancy brought me great relief. I’d feared that she was going to have to suffer savage treatment at Black Jack’s hands in order for the integrity of the time-line to be preserved, but this was a nice swap-out, and one that means two wonderful things: Frank isn’t directly descended from his evil doppelganger, and Mary Hawkins will only have to be joined to this monster for a couple of days before death officiates their divorce.

The road to Black Jack’s agreement to this union was an interesting if deeply uncomfortable one. At first, it seemed like Randall was using his discussion with Claire to indulge his sadism – revisiting his crimes upon Jamie just so that he could watch the pain and anger on Claire’s face – but he was essentially, in some weird and deeply warped way, trying to save his brother’s wife from his darker nature. Was that… noble? I’ve no idea.

Then Black Jack watches his brother pass, and the contrast between him and Dougal couldn’t be more stark. Claire once called Dougal a narcissist, and I disagreed. This episode carried the proof. Dougal is a complex, vain, bottled-up, angry muddle of a man, but there’s nothing pathological about him. He grieves, he feels, he loves.

Black Jack, on the other hand, rather re-affirms his narcissistic status here when he explodes in rage at the point of his brother’s death and starts punching his newly dead brother in the face. I laughed, very loudly, mostly at the shock and surprise of it.

When it comes down to it, there’s no changing Captain Jonathan Randall.

And there’s no changing Culloden.

See you for the finale.

A few final disjointed thoughts

  • Let’s have one final nugget of appreciation for Simon Callow’s turn as The Duke. What a character: so deliberate, so poised, so deliciously wicked. “The last thing I’d do would be to blurt.”
  • In episode 11, we see Claire extracting a woman’s tooth – now THAT’s a rational fear of the dentist. Us lilly-livered, pink-drink-drinking sissies don’t know we’re born.
  • Pity poor Rupert as he sits lamenting the death of his friend, Angus, through the re-telling of bawdy stories about the hairy-faced little rat. Drunk and dead-eyed, Rupert turns to a young lad who’s waiting in line (understandably very reluctantly) for some 18th century dentistry, and adds to his trauma with the story of the time Angus swallowed some teeth. “Said he didnae shite for a week for fear of being bitten.” That made me laugh.
  • I wonder how they made that horrible squishy-cracky sound when Claire retrieved the musket bullet from Rupert’s eye? That was appropriately revolting.
  • The awful spectre of rape hangs over just about every episode of this show. Remember when Claire offered herself up to the English soldiers, claiming to be a hostage, to ensure the freedom of Jamie and Dougal et al? No sooner had I written in my notepad ‘I do hope she isn’t threatened with rape again’ than a sleazy English soldier cocked a leg and said, ‘You look like you need warming up.’ Talk about #McMeToo
  • Jamie tried to convince the Bonnie Prince that the men were weary, and should be allowed to rest, replenish and regroup, to which the daring dandy replied: “I am not some frightened hare to be chased down by a pack of English dogs. I am a man. I am a soldier. And I shall comport myself as one.” At which point I offered an incisive critique of his tactics by shouting at the TV, “Fuck off, you wee wank.”
  • Murtagh on Frank Randall: “Hasn’t enough suffering been had in the name of saving that mythical prick?” Murtagh, I bloody love you.

READ THE REST – Click below

Why I want to binge-watch Outlander

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 1 – 4

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 5 – 8

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 9 – 12

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 13 – 16

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 2, Eps 1 – 4

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 2, Eps 5 – 7

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 2, Eps 8 – 10

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 2, Ep 13

30 Things You Didn’t Know About Scotland

Jamie’s Outlander Binge: Season 2, Eps 8 – 10

Posted on by

Part 6: Bad dads and sad lads

Wherein war tastes bitter no matter the outcome

As Outlander whisks us from the Frasers’ return to Scotland through to the bloody climax of the battle of Prestonpans we’re left in little doubt that the laughs, luxury and light-touch of the French court (miscarriage and murder notwithstanding) are far behind us. Team Clamie’s last, desperate attempts to kick causality up the backside, and deliver the highlanders from the clutches of death – both cultural and literal – don’t generate that much in the way of guffaws. It’s almost as if war isn’t funny (Catch 22 and Blackadder Goes Forth notwithstanding).

Over the course of these three episodes Jamie gets to test his mettle as leader, and pit his wits against an unholy trinity of father figures (grandpa, uncle and spiritual father of the rebellion, respectively). Meanwhile, Claire endures a traumatic period of re-adjustment to the world of war, something she probably never expected to have to do again, given that she’d just lived through the ‘war to end all wars’. Pesky time-travel.

Her first world war, the world’s second, but the first in which she’d nursed, was bad enough, but this war, her second, which isn’t a world war but came first, before the first or the second, which were world wars, comes first in the worst stakes, principally because this time she’s cursed to be versed in how things will unfurl in the world into which she’s been hurled.

And try saying that after a night on the piss with Murtagh.

Because the Jacobite Uprising appears to have been a war in desperate want of soldiers, Jamie’s first stop along the road to rebellion is at the house of his grandfather, Lord Lovat, whom he needs to convince to send men to fight under his banner. Fergus comes, too, on donkey-back no less; Jamie’s very own Sancho Panza there to accompany him as he roams the Scottish countryside tilting at windmills.

The biggest problem facing the Frasers in the domain of Grandpa Greystoke, Lord of the Rapes, is Lord Lovat himself. It’s hard enough to get the guy to make you a cup of tea, much less donate troops. It quickly becomes clear that what Jamie’s grandpa wants most of all is Lallybroch. He might not have managed to get his grubby paws on it this time, but I’m sure this won’t be his final attempt.

While Lord Lovat looks positively humanitarian next to the series’ alpha-villain Black Jack Randall, that’s not to mistake him for a nice guy. Far from it. He’s actually a pretty bloody horrible guy. It’s like when Kim Jong Un calls Donald Trump ‘crazy’. Yes, Mr Un, you’re technically correct; your opposite number across the ocean with the equally unfortunate hair-do does indeed possess an abundance of undiagnosed psychological disorders, but you’re not exactly a stranger to the DSM-5 yourself, you vainglorious, reality-raping basket-case.

When Lovat isn’t tossing around sexual threats (seriously, the 18th century is such a relentlessly grim and rapey place it’s practically the BBC in the 1970s), he likes to spend his free time being cruel, cynical, covetous, mercurial, brutal, boorish and rude – and I’ll bet he leaves the lid off the toothpaste, too. This all makes him rather a hard man to negotiate with. Harder still when the curmudgeonly Colum is at his table, too, lobbying hard against Jamie. I’ve missed Colum. Not very much. At all. Especially. That stilted. Way of. Speaking he has. That makes it sound as though his words. Are running round an obstacle course. Strewn with full-stops.

Laoghaire’s back, too, principally to atone for her part in almost getting Claire killed in season one, but also to show us that the fires of her devotion to Jamie still burn fierce and bright– even if she no longer desires to burn Claire to death in their hot flames. The last time Claire was in Colum and Laoghaire’s company, being seen as a witch was something of a bad career move (death does little to enhance your job prospects). Here, as in Paris, the White Witch persona proves to be an asset. This time, Jamie employs the supernatural ruse to dissuade his Grandpa from sexually assaulting his wife. That’s a spectacularly depressing sentence to write. There’s an episode of Jeremy Kyle in there somewhere (substitute ‘Jerry Springer’ if you’re from across the pond).

Today’s episode: YOU SAY YOUR WIFE ISN’T A WITCH. THEN WHY HAVE MY BALLS BEEN BLASTED LIKE A FROST-BITTEN APPLE?

You may recall seeing the actor who plays Lovat, Clive Russell, in the death-n-dragons epic Game of Thrones. Clive played Brynden Tully, the member of the Stark entourage who very narrowly avoided becoming something red, then something blue at the infamous Red Wedding on account of having to step outside for a piss.

But it’s poo that Clive’s more closely associated with in the minds of several generations of Scots thanks to his memorable performance as a guest star in Still Game, BBC Scotland’s incredibly funny sitcom about Glaswegian pensioners growing old disgracefully. In Still Game he played Big Innes, a taciturn mountain of a man who returned to his inner-city roots from his new home in the remote Highlands to help his old friends deal with a band of unruly youths.

Innes is a vast, human Hagrid of a man, taken to bouts of superhuman strength – especially when he gets his hands on Midori – and with an appetite to match. And when appetites are big, so too are their consequences. Near the end of the episode Innes lays a log in his friend Isa’s loo that’s large enough to upset the sun’s gravitational pull on the earth, certainly large enough to have earned him execution at the hands of a certain jealous and desperately constipated French King earlier this season.

It’s a shite to behold.

If you hail from outside these lands and Outlander has caused you to fall in love with Scotland, I entreat you to check out Still Game. Scotland isn’t all about breath-taking vistas, kilted pretty-boys and tribal honour: we’re also big fans of excrement and violence. Plus, you’ll find quite a roster of big-league guest stars in this little show, from a pre-Hagrid Robbie Coltrane, to a post-Doctor Who but pre-Hobbit Sylvester McCoy, to late-night US talk-show king Craig Ferguson.

Anyway, once Lord Lovat’s double-dealing, smoke-and-mirrors, arse-saving gymnastics result in Jamie netting some soldiers, it’s off with them to Jacobite Boot Camp. The men there are in fine fettle, gloriously unburdened as they are by the knowledge of their deadly destiny. They’re fuelled by optimism and adrenalin, both of which they’ll need in droves with Murtagh – aka Full Tartan Jacket – as their drill sergeant, yelling in their faces like a psychopath for three weeks, no doubt in the process spraying them with enough flakes of porridge to feed an entire regiment.

Dougal (He’s back! Erm… hooray?) doesn’t share the men’s joviality. Sure, he’s stoked for battle, and excited at the prospect of ripping out a few rib-cages to use as CD racks, but he’s not terribly impressed with having to play second fiddle to Jamie. Since their last encounter, the pupil has become the master. Not that Jamie was ever that studious a pupil to begin with, and not that Dougal really had that much to teach Jamie, beyond Dougal’s favourite quasi-commandment, ‘Love thyself as… erm… thyself.’

I thought Dougal was uncharacteristically and jarringly meek in the face of the new command structure, and especially in the face of Claire’s face, which was telling him to fuck himself (beautiful and richly-deserved moment, incidentally). I didn’t expect him to let his accusers and abusers off the hook with nothing more than a withering look, but I guess he’s smart enough to know when the odds are stacked against him. And perhaps, serpent that he undoubtedly is, he’s simply biding his time to strike.

I’m not sure I agree with Claire’s assessment of Dougal as a narcissist. He’s an egoist, certainly, and a blaggard, a bully and an arrogant old sod to boot, but clinically narcissistic? I’m not convinced. When he said he loved his country, and would die for it, I was inclined to believe him. Anyway, though Claire and I mightn’t agree on the finer points, I’m sure we’re on the same page when it comes to the chapter that’s sub-headed ‘Dougal is an arsehole’.

While the baldy, bearded one may have been forced to toe the line, he still found various indirect ways to challenge Jamie’s authority without openly defying him. Some of them were quite subtle. Like when Jamie was giving a rousing speech to his troops about the horrors of war and why it’s essential that they conduct themselves in a disciplined and orderly manner, and Dougal chose that exact moment to come running down the hill screaming like a fucking mad-man, his face daubed in dirt and his hairy man-tits shaking in the cold highland air.

In fairness, sometimes the ‘AAARRRRGGGHHHHHHHH!’ approach works better. Sometimes what’s required to successfully resolve an armed stand-off is to take bravery and push it that extra furlong over the line into insanity. You can see this in action when Dougal tests the firing range of a line of English soldiers by riding his horse as close to them as possible over boggy ground, and gets his hat shot off.

“And now, I’m aff to change ma breeks – because the hero of the hour has shat his pants.”

They must all have shat their pants as they later charged into battle, not only without armour, but into a thick pocket of mist and without even bothering to button up their shirts. Whoever was in charge of health and safety in that unit should’ve been sacked.

Claire naturally sees harrowing parallels between the war about to come, and the ‘future’ war just ended, made all the worse by her unique vantage point. Is it worse knowing or not knowing? Is it better to think that you might, if you’re lucky, die in your sleep at some point during your seventh or eighth decade on earth, or know without doubt that you’re going to be struck by a fast-moving train on the 18th of October 2026 at precisely 10:53? Is it better to bring yourself to believe that you might just bash the bosh and be back in Blighty by Christmas, or resign yourself to the incontrovertible, inescapable fact that you’re hurtling inexorably towards the fatal date of 16th of April 1746?

Claire’s and Jamie’s belief in their ability to unstick that fixed point in time is in many ways more fantastical than any faith that their 18th Century kinsfolk ever placed in white witches, baby-gathering faeries or good genital hygiene. No wonder Claire’s reeling from re-triggered PTSD. Even brief periods of camaraderie and jocularity among the men remind her of the brutal juxtaposition that’s surely just around the corner: the broken, bloody bodies; the reek of death. (Are Claire’s memories flash-forwards or flash-backs? They’re both, really, aren’t they?) I think the flashes work really well, chock-full of augury for Culloden, and allowing Caitriona to do some fine character work.

One man who seems to have no love of war or fighting is the man actually leading the rebellion, Scrawny Mince Charlie. I really like the portrayal of the character. The temptation must have been strong to make this romantic historical figure hopelessly noble, brave and true, but I’m glad they leaned into his whiny sense of entitlement and typical aristocratic disconnect from the common man he claims to serve. BPC is like a rich kid on a gap year looking to immerse himself in the full ‘ethnic’ Scottish experience – and what better way than by watching thousands of big hairy men fighting and swearing at each other before dying tragically young?

“The British are our enemies now but they may be our friends again.”

I don’t think that’s the galvanising cry the Jacobites expected to hear, Charlie.

War can also take its toll on the ears, with choice phrases like “You bushy-faced whoreson!” and “I’ll ram it up your arse until you taste it!” ringing in the air. I can relate to the raucous and bawdy banter of the troops. I don’t know if it’s a Scottish thing, a man thing, or a class thing, but it’s very rare for two Scottish males to express their affection and admiration for each other with anything other than vile insults and obscenities. Men have long been encouraged to equate love and tenderness with weakness and vulnerability.

If you’re walking down the street, and a bus goes by containing your best friend – and I mean this guy is your best friend, the guy you grew up with, the guy who’s always had your back, the guy you’d lay down and die for – if this bus goes by and you see your best friend’s face pressed up against the window pane, even before you know what’s happening your hand has curled into the near-universal sign for self-abuse, and you’re jumping up and down on the pavement gesticulating at your friend like an angry tramp doused in PCP.

Even if you’re visiting your best friend on his death-bed you still have to greet him by saying something like, ‘Looking a bit pasty there, you stinking, arse-faced donkey-fucker.’ (or “Ah’ll no allow that fat bawbag to die on me.”) With these parameters in place it can sometimes be difficult to distinguish between extreme love and extreme hate. A little tip, though: stabbing is rarely a sign of treasured kinship.

All this talk of death-beds makes this a particularly apposite time to talk about a certain doomed duo…

When Rupert and Angus re-appeared, a smile spread upon Claire’s face that was one part happiness to two parts, ‘These cheeky little monkeys, what are they like, eh?’ To employ the language of the riverboat for a moment, I’m afraid I couldn’t call or raise Claire’s smile. What I did do was glare at my TV set with a poker face. I did this not because I was trying to hide my true feelings, as is traditional with the poker face, but because my true feelings were best conveyed by pursing my lips tightly together and staring forwards through cold, flat eyes. I hated Angus especially, the bastard off-spring of a tiny wild-west bandit and an angry Chihuahua.

I even jotted down in my notepad these exact words: “Oh great… it’s Rupert and Angus. Boy, I hope they get wiped out, and as violently as possible.”

Careful what you wish for, eh?

The gruesome twosome has always served as the show’s comic relief, the Keystone Cops of Ye Olde Scotland, although in terms of relief I’ve always experienced the greatest share of it whenever they’ve left the screen. The episode ‘Prestonpans’ does a good job of adding flesh to the bones of these two caricatures, turning them into real people with vulnerabilities and inner lives. Turning them into people, to my incredible surprise (especially in Angus’s case), that I actually started to like.

It was obvious that one of them was going to die the second they had a detailed discussion about what they’d like to happen to their possessions post-mortem. But who died, and how, was still a surprise. Not to mention surprisingly harrowing to watch.

Angus’s death sent out a strong signal: if the hitherto one-note comic relief can die choking in horrible agony, then don’t expect any laughs in the conflict to come. But always expect the unexpected.

A few final disjointed thoughts

  • Awwwwwww. Jamie holding a baby!
  • I don’t think we’ve seen the last of the little English boy who infiltrated Jamie’s camp. He’ll definitely be back. He doesn’t know how lucky he was to be captured by Jamie Fraser and not Shane from the Walking Dead, else he’d have had his neck snapped before his vow of vengeance had a chance to form on his lips.
  • I once talked about the sanitary considerations of cunnilingus in the olden days – but, Claire, I just watched you French-kiss a guy who had the arterial blood of sixty dead English men rubbed around his lips. IT’S LIKE YOU ALL WANT TO DIE?!
  • Dougal bayoneting that injured English soldier made him seem brutal, but then he is, and so is war. Still yukky though.
  • I don’t think I’ve ever witnessed an actual, literal pissing contest before. Thanks, Outlander.
  • Jamie does Dougal a great service by speaking up for him to Bonnie Prince Charlie. But, knowing history as he does – his faith in changing the outcome of events notwithstanding – he’s also technically handing Dougal a confirmed death sentence. Kudos.

READ THE REST – Click below

Why I want to binge-watch Outlander

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 1 – 4

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 5 – 8

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 9 – 12

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 1, Eps 13 – 16

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 2, Eps 1 – 4

Jamie’s Outlander Binge – Season 2, Eps 5 – 7

30 Things You Didn’t Know About Scotland

Young Jamie: Portrait of the Artist as a Wee Bastard – Part 2: Culloden

Posted on by

Have a read at this very short story I wrote when I was nine-years-old, and then wallow in the pointlessness of it all as my 36-year-old self tries to provide some context.

Part 1

Part 1

Part 2

Part 2

Part 3

Part 3

THE GREAT BATTLE OF CULLODEN

If this little story proves anything, it’s that I was just as bloodthirsty in 1989 as I am today. “We stabbed people who were trying to kill us.” Most nine-year-olds are writing about scoring the winning goal at the World Cup, or meeting Bruce Willis, or being the King or Queen of Lovelyland, yet here I am neck-deep in blood and corpses, gleefully stabbing folk to death with my pals.

I didn’t enjoy my teacher’s smug tone when she pointed out there were no aeroplanes in 1746. How does it feel to attempt to shame a nine-year-old, woman? I’m sure there must have been many more inexcusable gaps in my knowledge that you could’ve exposed, so why stop there?

“Honestly, Jamie, it’s like you’ve got no grasp at all of the wider political and economic turmoil that held Scotland in its grip throughout most of the eighteenth century.”

I know there were no planes, you soulless daughter of a chartered accountant called Alan! You derisory dick-bag of a woman! You Lovejoy-loving, gentle fucking facist! Have you never heard of a little something called, oh I don’t know, IMAGINATION?! You know, the thing that kids are allowed to possess before it’s beaten out of them by the snooker-ball-in-a-sock of the real world?

THIS is why mass death is brill, teach. BECAUSE OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU.

PS: This story in no way reflects my current status as a card-carrying member of the SNP.

Young Jamie: Portrait of the Artist as a Wee Bastard – Part 1: MERLIN